Nominated for Three Oscars
Best Actor
Best Actor in a Supporting Role
Best Actress in a Supporting
Role
Where to start when reviewing the work of
P.T. Anderson as a director and intellectual presence in cinema? His films
often confound, sometimes infuriate, in the oblique nature of their
presentation. We are definitely in the presence of an artist who doesn’t seem
to particularly care if the work is completely understood or not.
I could recite the plot of this film but I
don’t think I can properly “explain” what it’s about. Here is a synopsis. Let’s
reconvene, shall we, once you’ve read this?
I think many of P.T. Anderson’s films are about
the struggle to free oneself from some controlling, often authoritarian,
element in one’s life - often represented by a father figure: the charismatic
cult leader Lancaster Dodds in The Master; the brutal oil baron Daniel Plainview
in There will be Blood; Claudia Wilson’s child molesting father the game show
host, or, the professional misogynistic Frank Mackey’s conflicted relationship with
his own father in Magnolia.
Here in The Master it is represented by
Lancaster Dodds (Philip Seymour Hoffman), who some have said greatly resembles
the controversial Scientology founder L. Ron Hubbard (an observation that
Anderson somehow manages to elude in conversation about his film). Dodds
controls and manipulates the volatile, alcoholic Freddie Quell (Joaquin
Phoenix), a returning WWII seaman who fails at virtually everything he attempts
to do from photographing customers in a department store to labour as a migrant
worker where he inadvertently poisons a fellow worker with homemade hooch. His temper, his alcoholism, make him appear untameable and unemployable until …
Quell falls under Dodds’ spell, as do
hundreds of others; he becomes a kind of body guard/bully boy for the
charismatic leader even going so far as manhandling Dodds’ own son for
criticizing his own father. Dodds alternately coddles and torments Freddie –
appearing to be charmed by Freddie’s more feral characteristics. Dodds subjects
Quell to a series of intrusive and often prurient questions that are supposedly
meant to break down the subject’s resistance to “The Cause” and are said to
resemble the interrogations that Scientology members are often subjected to.
Much of the film is about how Freddie responds to this control of his
personality.
Phoenix is remarkable here. His inner torment
informing every gesture, every grimace. So often in contemporary films dealing
with a historical period does the viewer feel the anachronism of an actor’s
face, gestures, body shape, tone. Not so with Phoenix, who looks and acts every bit
the hard-bitten, angry, alcoholic loner who has lived through the Depression and WWII.
When Quell finally eludes Dodds he returns
perhaps to an even more elemental form of nature – woman – sleeping with a bar
maid (virtually the first woman he meets when he leaves Dodds forever after their meeting in England) and
seeming to, for at least a short while, attain some sort of inner peace.
The last shot of the film shows Quell, back in his days as a seaman, lying beside and caressing a dissolving form of a woman made of sand on a beach. Is this what men must return to – why he must escape the control of the patriarch – to seek solace in woman? Perhaps, perhaps.
The last shot of the film shows Quell, back in his days as a seaman, lying beside and caressing a dissolving form of a woman made of sand on a beach. Is this what men must return to – why he must escape the control of the patriarch – to seek solace in woman? Perhaps, perhaps.
Quell under Dodds' spell |
No comments:
Post a Comment